Friday, January 19, 2007

Retrofitting For Passive Solar

By Douglas J E Barnes

The following is a write up of a seminar given at
Noah’s Café in Tokyo. The focus of the seminar was suggesting potential retrofits to the café to reduce the heating costs. More will be written on passive solar design in the future, but for the purposes of this article, we will just look at enough to understand how to retrofit existing buildings.

In cold climates, 20% of the economy can be dedicated in one way or another to keeping warm. For areas below the Arctic Circle, this need not be the case. On a sunny winter’s day at 45°N (or south) latitude, there is around 957 Wh/m2 available to us for heating… if we use it. This is almost equivalent to the energy used by running a 1000W hairdryer for one hour falling on every square metre of ground.

There are 3 types of heating available to us: convective heating (heating using hot air), conductive heating (an object coming into contact with a hotter object), and radiant heating (heat radiating off a hot object such as the sun). While conductive heating is the most efficient, it is not practical for heating living spaces. Convective heating is the most common, but is also the least efficient. Radiant heating is the most efficient means of heating that is available to us. Luckily, we can get the sun to help us to use radiant heat.

To capture the sun’s heat, we use a technique called passive solar heating. We allow visible sunlight to enter a building through a window. When the sunlight hits objects in a room, some of that light is transformed into longer wave infrared light or heat. The windows then prevent most of the infrared light from escaping the building. Massive structures (concrete, brick or even water tanks) called thermal mass are used to store the heat generated and slowly re-radiate it into the building.

Although it seems obvious, it should be stated that passive solar systems need to be oriented towards the sun. It is worth mentioning because people have made the mistake of not doing this in the past. It is best that buildings are oriented so that they are within 10° of the polar axis (i.e. due south if you are in the northern hemisphere).

Because the change in the sun angle is so great in temperate areas where passive solar heating is needed, the system automatically adjusts solar gain throughout the season. In the summer when heating is not needed, the sun is high in the sky meaning that the eaves of the roof cut solar gain. In winter, the sun is low admitting more light and allowing more solar gain.

Existing buildings can often be retrofit to increase solar gain from windows that are actually on the shady side of the build. This is done be placing reflectors outside the windows on the shady side of the building. Designer Derek Wrigley has built these and reports that the 4.3m2 reflector system on his home in Canberra "is the equivalentof having a 1kW electric radiator on in the room for 9.72 hours each sunny day."

With a little work, an electric motor can be attached to a reflector to make it rotate incrementally throughout the day allowing a steady beam of light to enter a given window. This technique could be used to target a specific thermal mass body. [Derek Wrigley has also installed this system in his home.]

A technique sometimes used on new homes is the trombe wall. From the outside, a trombe wall looks like a window built over a wall, but it is a very effective passive solar technique. A thermal mass wall is built then covered with glass to trap the heat it stores.

A cheap, portable version can be made of water-filled bottles and placed next to a window to make use of that window’s solar gain. As sunlight strikes the wall, heat is stored in the water to be slowly radiated outward.

Thermal siphons are another retrofitting option; and finished, ready to use units are sold in Australia under the name Sun Lizard. To save money, you can make your own out of easily found materials. To do so, you would construct an insulated box with a black piece of corrugated steel inside and a glass top. Solar powered fans can be used to increase the air flowing through a thermal siphon.

Windows will lose heat at night, so covering them up can save a lot of energy. The best method would be an internal shutter that completely covers the window. If that is not possible, heavy curtains can be used to help stop heat loss. The drapes need to seal off the window, so attaching the sides of the curtains to the wall with Velcro is a good idea. From there, the top is sealed off with a foam block so that air cannot enter from the top of the curtain rod. The bottom is sealed at the floor with cloth rolls on the inside and outside of the curtain.

As an example, we took the building housing Noah’s Café in Nakano Ward in Tokyo. The orientation of the building was not bad (close to due south), but neighbouring buildings blocked a lot of sun reaching the first floor. The second floor and roof, however, have good solar access that could be tapped.

Some possibilities include a bottle wall in the second story window and thermal siphons on both the wall and the roof of the building as shown.

To keep in the heat generated, curtains could be fitted as described above. Additionally, blown-in cellulose insulation could be used to insulate the walls and attic of the building, which are currently uninsulated.

Labels: ,

12 Comments:

At 2:58 PM, January 20, 2007, Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

Excellent diagrams, djeb!

I especially like the one explaining the different kinds of heat, and the thermal syphons.

Thinking about the potential of harvesting passive solar heat in terms of 1000W hairdryer-hours, really makes the point sink home. Why aren't more people taking advantage of this free, renewable source of energy in a passive way?!

One thing I'm thinking about however, is the efficiency of putting a heat production device like a thermal syphon, on a rooftop; simply because heat rises. It's kind of like the standard A/C heater units here in Japan that are always mounted at the ceiling. The air just collects at the ceiling, and doesn't ever really get around to warming the room very quickly (if at all).

Sure, every little bit helps, and it might be better to have one than not (even if it's on the roof). But I think the thermal syphons would work much better lower down on a wall so we can take advantage of heat rising.

As for retrofitting with thermal mass, I like the idea of the bottle/trombe wall, but maybe that's not very practical in the Tokyo environment where space is EXTREMELY limited. I'm thinking of desiging one as a rolling shelf unit/knick-knack table to put next to our south-facing sliding glass doors (uninsulated, and not very well sealed). Using different colored bottles would add a sort of stained glass effect.

I'm also thinking of ways of retrofitting apartments for thermal mass. It's not really practical (or even possible in most cases?) To retrofit with concrete floors, but it's probably easier, and more financially feasible to tile a floor near south facing windows. We can always put rugs over them if they get hit by sun in the summer time.

As for the insulation of windows, I think people with a flare for interior design could really have fun turning that foam block above the window into a new kind of practical feature by wrapping the foam block in various kinds of material to match the rolls at the bottom...coordinating them with the curtains.

It would be nice to see photos of people actually doing this.

Bottle/Trombe walls and the curtain insulation ideas have great potential not just for practical, but aesthetic value as well.

One thing not mentioned here, but highly worthwhile, is the possibility of retrofitting homes with passive-solar greenhouses on the southern sides. These not only provide heat, but food, chances for greywater filtration beds, and the production of Oxygen rich air full of negative eons.

They not only provides passive solar heat for the home, but improves our environment, and allows us to grow organic salad greens and other things to improve our health while also relieving a bit of stress on our super-market budgets year-round and reducing our water use, and contribution to water treatment facilities.

Perhaps passive solar greenhouse retrofits are expensive to initially build and install, but the savings and benefits would more than make up for the cost in a relatively short period of time.


Again...this is all great stuff. Thanks for posting this.

 
At 4:06 PM, January 20, 2007, Blogger DJEB said...

It is certainly better to introduce heat at floor level, and that's just a matter of duct work. With a roof-mounted thermal siphon, one would need to have a (solar powered) fan to pump out the hot air out or it wouldn't do anything.

Wall-mounted thermal siphons would work fine without the assistance of fans as their positioning would create a natural flow sucking in cold air and releasing hot air.

As for retrofitting, if you are the owner of a wooden building with good solar access, then it may be possible to renovate a home by pouring a concrete floor in a home to act as a thermal mass. Tiles can do a little bit, but because of their lack of thickness, they cannot store much heat. [The ideal thickness is 4 inches - after that diminishing returns make more mass uneconomic.]

My Tokyo apartment is built of concrete, but being an uninsulated mass, it does nothing more than suck out heat in winter and hold in heat in summer. The most effective retrofit here would be to insulate the apartment unit.

"It would be nice to see photos of people actually doing this."

:D When I get land and start building, I will be able to show the whole process from design to full implementation. I don't have plants for either a trombwe wall or a thermal siphon, but if heating becomes an issue, I would seriously consider a thermal siphon.

I'm glad you mentioned greenhouse additions. While they would not fit Noah's Café, they would be a great addition for any home with sufficient space and solar access. They can also be set up with vents to perform like thermal siphons. Great stuff.

 
At 10:50 PM, January 21, 2007, Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

It's really nice to know that about the necessary thickness of the thermal mass (i.e. tile). Just to clarify, I was hoping that would be an available option to people owning apartments or condos, who wouldn't be able to pour concrete floors. Owning a house is a totally different story.

Hey, there's one thing that I just thought of that might be feasible for Noah's cafe.

I believe that it would be totally possible to plant evergreen (or extremely hardy vines that won't lose their leaves in winter) on the front of the building to cover the outer wall. That would help out with insulation (severely lacking in most buildings here in Japan, as we discussed at the seminar).

In winter, the leaves would hang down (trapping air behind them that would warm up from the sun) They would also help in cooling the building in Summer time (when the leaves raise up shading the side of the building and releasing transpiration, thus cooling the air around them).

Vines that don't lose their leaves in a Tokyo winter on the south side could behave as both passive solar heating and passive solar cooling at the same time...depending on the season.

 
At 10:59 PM, January 21, 2007, Blogger DJEB said...

The vines you mention are a great point that I neglected. They can either grow over the wall, or a lattice can be set up over the wall for the vines to grow on. They help cut cold wind stiking the building which saves on heating.

On tiles, based on my experience in my brother's house, they are too thin to be of much use. They heat up and cool down very quickly (the furnace heating duct ran under the floor and would heat the wood then tile, but the tiles quickly became cold when the furnace shut down). The cost of the tiles wouldn't pay back in energy savings. Personally, I can't recommend them.

 
At 1:50 PM, January 23, 2007, Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

I can understand not wanting to recommend the flawed tile system your brother has (i.e. thin tiles on wood (not the best insulation) over a heat duct...not the best heat source). Most likely, it sounds as if the tiles were not installed for heat mass anyway, but for aesthetic purposes.

However, I think if you were living in a condo or apartment, where you were able to or it was time to replace a floor, or even a section of floor, then tiles of the proper thickness (as you mentioned) set on an insulated surface (not wood so the heat doesn't dissappear through the floor), placed in an area where they would be exposed to long periods of winter sun, then you would have proper heat mass...and that was my point.

If done correctly, with the right purpose in mind, proper masonry tiles (proper being the operative word) would be probably a much more feasible option than trying to get the approval, or going through the complications of putting in concrete floor in a condo or an owned apartment (not the whole complex, but just one of many apartments, which is often the case here in Tokyo).

In places where your options for renovation are limited, properly installed tile might just be ideal.

It's important to give people options and alternatives and I just wanted to say that we shouldn't perhaps write tile off entirely because of an experience with a flawed system.

For some people, and in certain situations, tile, or perhaps something else other than concrete, might be the ideal choice, or the only available option.

We need to use the right tool for the right job and in my experience there has never been a universal tool that is going to fit every job.

As permaculture designers, it's better to go into the various situations that we face with a large bag of effective tricks, rather than thinking about eliminating them. Diversity and flexibility is key.

Furthermore, the more options that we can stack together and have working in concert (like your example of heat syphons with bottle/trombe wall), the more efficient, stable and sustainable the system will be.

 
At 2:45 PM, January 23, 2007, Blogger DJEB said...

I think you are right about not dismissing things too quickly. After a single failure, it often comes to mind that an entire idea is wrong. But it is often the case that a good idea was executed improperly. (I've heard of two opposite examples of passive solar that would give one the incorrect impression - one that it doesn't work well enough, the other that it makes your house too hot.)

Going with tiles, I would recommend avoiding the usual terra cotta tiles and go for the thickest quarry tiles available. They need not be installed over the entire floor - just were there is solar gain.

As an aside, here are some figures that might be useful when considering material for thermal mass. Heat storage capacity per unit volume:

WATER - 4186 kJ/m^3

CONCRETE - 2060 kJ/m^3

SANDSTONE - 1800 kJ/m^3

COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCKS - 1740 kJ/m^3

RAMMED EARTH - 1673 kJ/m^3

BRICK - 1360 kJ/m^3

EARTH WALL (ADOBE) - 1300 kJ/m^3

Autoclaved Aerated Concrete - 550 kJ/m^3

 
At 8:39 AM, January 24, 2007, Anonymous Doug said...

Great article! And the Heat storage capacity list from DJEB is super helpful. I've been dreaming of large fish tanks under the floor for a long time and it's great to see it would be practical too!

 
At 9:54 AM, January 24, 2007, Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

Doug, yeah...I started thinking about rigging up some glass bricks filled with water, myself.

I remember Bill talking in class about skylights filled with water now too. Tie that in with a heat mass wall down below, and I think you'd be generating some warmth in the room.

We also forgot to mention the increasingly popular radiant heat concrete floors with hot water pipes running through the concrete (hot-water supplied by solar heating as well). However, this option may not be practical as a retrofit.

 
At 11:53 AM, March 24, 2007, Blogger stew said...

Hello there

Further to some of your comments, Home Power magazine has many articles about solar collectors (a diy one in issue 109 for example). I can't locate it at the mo, but there was a two-issue feature on them that said its critical to have the cold intake at a low position so as to "pull" the hot air in the room down from ceiling level.

There is a fully commercialized solar collector system in Japan called "OM solar". Thousands of OM solar houses have been built. They use collectors integrated into the roof and pump the heated air to a slab foundation. From the schematics, it looks more like heated and dried ventilation than cycling indoor air, not a bad thing with Japan's humidity. A heat exchanger for hot water is also included.

As for water as thermal mass, a Japanese company called Izena produces an underfloor heating system that uses long plastic bags fitted underfloor and filled with water onsite as thermal mass. These can be heated as desired with forced air, hot water piping, etc., but most commonly are heated directly with sheetlike electric heaters running on overnight low-tariff electricity. Since the water circulates within the bags (typically 7m long), thermal gradients across the space are prevented. Its called "Aqua Layer Heating".

While they are about as un-airtight as a house can be and do not include much thermal mass (typically having no foundations and simply resting on a few stones on the ground), a great many Japanese minka farmhouses are built along an east-west axis for maximum southern exposure. I think its the erstwhile abundance of fossil fuels that have led people away from the received wisdom of passive solar methods. As an idea, passive solar is certainly nothing new. See for example the gloriously idiosyncratic "Your Engineered House" by Rex Roberts (pub. 1964).

I like your blog and with call in again! Now that winter is over, are there any seminars, etc. on permaculture coming up soon in Japan?

 
At 7:00 AM, March 26, 2007, Blogger DJEB said...

Thanks for your comment Stew. Sorry I didn't get to it right away - I was teaching a weekend seminar here in Canada.

I will be returning Tokyo briefly in May and giving a seminar at that time. However, Scott Meister is giving one on Friday, March 30st. For more information on that event, please see http://permaculture-log.com/news/index.php?e=24

 
At 6:53 PM, June 06, 2007, Blogger Wang said...

excellent diagrams! they gave me lots extra info from wiki, google etc... i'm really not sure whether trombe wall is workablel in low high rise flat (6-8 storeies high)???? that's what i'm trying to figure out at the moment ...V-V

 
At 12:21 AM, June 17, 2009, Anonymous Josh W said...

Another idea for retrofitting a house is to insulate on the outside of the house, especially for those houses with thicker walls, as this allows the walls themselves to act as thermal mass. As a more radical adaption, you can stick a curtain of glass around the whole building, and paint the walls a darker colour, turning all the walls into trombe walls. If you live in a place with deep red bricks, you can take the finish off the walls when you do this, leading to quite a nice effect!

I think I've just inspired myself to go off and do that!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home